Our model is proud to be a size 10 or 12. She can accept being a size 14. But she is stunned to be a tiny size 8.
A Herald on Sunday mystery shop has revealed huge size disparities between stores.
In one Auckland mall, our test dummy slipped comfortably into size 8, 10, 12 and 14 dresses. At Aussie label Cue she was a perfect 10 and at Farmers she was pleasantly surprised to fit comfortably into a size 8.
But at teen chain store Blueberry the dresses marked “large” and “14” fit just as well as the smaller sizes in other stores. And at Glassons, our shopper found one size-8 dress fitted perfectly – but so did size 12 in another style.
AUT University’s fashion school head Andreas Mikellis said the erratic sizing made shopping difficult – especially online.
He said some stores employed “vanity sizing” – labelling garments a size smaller than usual – to flatter a customer into buying.
“Marketing and sizing work together sometimes,” he said.
“It’s about engaging someone in your brand by having someone fit into a smaller size. It does happen.”
There were no “standard” sizes in New Zealand – or anywhere else in the world – which left the decision of what a size 10 looked like up to the designers. He said he would support moves to make sizing more consistent, but conceded it was unrealistic in the age of the “global economy”.
Australian design and fashion researchers discovered that an average size 10 had increased a huge 15cm since the 1970s, when a size 10 woman would have to have tiny 80-60-85cm measurements across her bust, waist and hips. Now it is 95-75-105cm.
Fashion Industry NZ executive officer Mapihi Opai said the actual fit of a garment should take priority over the number on the label.
Clothing brands meticulously developed pattern blocks for a specific target audience and their customers returned because that fit worked for them, she added.
“The argument against standardised sizing is that the human body doesn’t come in a standardised form.
“Most people don’t conform to a very precise set of measurements. We’re not built like mannequins,” she said.
By Celeste Gorrell Anstiss
| Email Celeste
See the original article here –